An honest comparison
weakestlink vs Nimblr
Nimblr is a solid Nordic player, but its pricing model requires contacting sales and typically locks you into a year-long contract. We show our pricing openly, let you start for free, and you only pay per user with no lock-in.
| weakestlink | Nimblr | |
|---|---|---|
| Publicly available pricing | ✓ | Requires contact (~£3/user reported) |
| Free trial | ✓ | Not disclosed |
| No lock-in contract | ✓ | Annual contract (typical) |
| Self-service — no demo required | ✓ | Contact/qualification required |
| All languages at no extra cost | ✓ | Nordic languages |
| Hosted in Denmark/EU | ✓ | EU/Nordics |
| Adaptive difficulty per employee | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ongoing, spaced simulations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Aggregated reports — only the administrator sees individuals | ✓ | ✓ |
This comparison is based on publicly available information as of July 2026. We're happy to update it — email info@weakestlink.io if anything is inaccurate.
See the difference for yourself — free account in five minutes
No demo, no salesperson, no lock-in. See the price and catalogue freely.